Latest news Older news
Psst! Scroll up!
Notice that the logo (the yellow thing that says CALSβ in big, friendly letters up top) is now clickable and leads back to the homepage. This is because the days of the Home-link in the navbar are numbered, it needs to go to make room for something new! Which one day, suddenly, will just turn up, as if by magic! Okay, dev, caffeine, now.
Pinned: 2014-10-21 22:06
Fixed weird bug in sign up form
Turns out half the sign-up page has been broken. The form to sign up the old-fashioned way has been invisble for some time! The cause was a really weird CSS-bug/feature that'll have me rereading the standards to see if it's just me, just the browsers I've tested it in or just the moon phase that is to blame. The old CSS worked, until some magical mysterious moment some time in the past when it didn't!?
Thanks for the heads up, Julanga!
Pinned: 2014-10-21 22:02
2014-10-28 18:01 Seraphin just joined
Seraphin, who joined on Oct. 28, 2014, 6:01 p.m., is now Doing Stuff!
2014-10-26 05:02 KippLeKipp just joined
KippLeKipp, who joined on Oct. 26, 2014, 5:02 a.m., is now Doing Stuff!
What defines your conlang?
By adding your language here, and answering the questions by choosing a single value for each relevant WALS-feature (e.g. it's not a goal to answer every single one of them!), you might discover new things in your conlang, or grammar gaps that need to be filled somehow. By reading the descriptions of each feature at WALS, you also get a crash course in linguistic typology and universals – but be warned, some of those papers are overly scholarly...
- Pick some features and values at random, then try to make a language out of that.
- What would the most average conlang look like? Should it be updated to stay the most average?
- Contrary, would a conlang with many rare and unusual features be usable at all?
New stuff and changes have been moved to its own page. See also the link in the footer.